Connectivity and Corridors: Türkiye’s Middle Corridor Vision through International Trade


To Download, click herehere, or here


Ozgur Tufekci, Dr
Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Karadeniz Technical University

Muharrem Bayrak
PhD Candidate, Department of International Relations, Karadeniz Technical University

Hakan Uslu, Dr
Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Finance, Samsun University


Abstract

This paper investigates the potential impact of Türkiye on international trade with Middle Corridor (MC) countries, taking into account its geopolitical and strategic role over the past two decades and evaluating how the corridor affects connectivity between partner countries. The study employs a gravity model (GM) to investigate the impact of trade flows on the Turkish economy. Our analysis utilizes a panel dataset spanning from 1990 to 2023. It incorporates a range of estimators, including the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood (PPML), the fixed effects (FE) estimator, and the random effects (RE) estimator. The findings obtained from all estimation models demonstrate that the gravity model accurately represents Türkiye’s foreign trade with MC countries. In particular, the findings based on all the estimators suggest a positive correlation between the GDP per capita of importing countries and Türkiye’s exports to the member states of the MC. More precisely, the results of the RE model indicate that a 1% increase in the average per capita gross domestic product of an importer country is associated with a 0.92% increase in exports from Türkiye to that country. The findings also indicated a positive correlation between the religious and linguistic homogeneity of the two countries and their membership in the MC. Overall, our results suggest that enhancing economic relations with the nations involved in the MC presents an advantageous scenario and promises significant policy benefits.

Keywords: Türkiye Middle Corridor gravity model international trade Asia


To read more, please download the article by clicking herehere, or here

Endnotes
1 Anthony J. Venables, “Comment on Infrastructure and Regional Cooperation by Haruhiko Kuroda, Masahiro Kawai and Rita Nangia,” in François Bourguignon & Boris Pleskovic (eds.), Rethinking Infrastructure for Development, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2007, pp. 261–264.
2 Haruhiko Kuroda, Masahiro Kawai & Rita Nangia, “Infrastructure and Regional Cooperation,” in François Bourguignon & Boris Pleskovic (eds.), Rethinking Infrastructure for Development, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2007, pp. 235–259.
3 Yiping Huang, “Understanding China’s Belt & Road Initiative: Motivation, Framework and Assessment,” China Economic Review, Vol. 40 (2016), pp. 314–321.
4 Fernando Ascensão et al., “Environmental Challenges for the Belt and Road Initiative,” Nature Sustainability, Vol. 1, 2018, pp. 206–209.
5 Tristan Kenderdine & Peter Bucsky, “Middle Corridor: Policy Development and Trade Potential of the Trans-Caspian International Route,” Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper, No. 1268, May 2021, https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/705226/adbiwp1268.pdf (Accessed: 13.08.2024).
6 Evgeny Vinokurov, “Transport Corridors, Belt and Road Initiative, Eurasian Economic Union and Economic Prosperity across the Eurasian Continent,” in Institute of Russian, Eastern European and Central Asian Studies, CASS & Russian International Affairs Council (eds.), Global Governance in the New Era: Concepts and Approaches, Cham: Springer, 2023, pp. 145–151.
7 Suprabha Baniya et al., “Trade Effects of New Silk Road: A Gravity Analysis,” World Bank Group Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8694, January 2019, https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/8f5520c2-3315-58c5-bb42-23460e90fb70/content (Accessed: 13.08.2024).
8 Jakub Jakobowski et al., The Silk Railroad: The EU-China Rail Connections: Background, Actors, Interests, Warsaw: OSW, 2018.
9 Celal Şenol & Süheyla U. Erbilen, “Analysis of the Impact of the Middle Corridor on Türkiye in terms of Geopolitics and Economy in the OBOR Initiative,” Journal of Geography, Vol. 45 (2022), pp. 161–180.
10 Amparo Baviera-Puig et al., “Comparing Trade Areas of Technology Centres Using ‘Geographical Information Systems,” The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 33, No. 7–8 (2013), pp. 789–801; Emelia Walsund, Geographical Information Systems as a Tool in Sustainable Urban Development, unpublished master’s thesis, Malmö: Malmö University, 2013; Suhas Jadhav & Ishita Ghosh, “Future Prospects of the Gravity Model of Trade: A Bibliometric Review (1993–2021),” Foreign Trade Review, Vol. 59, No. 1 (2023), pp. 26–61; Saleh Shahriar et al., “The Gravity Model of Trade: A Theoretical Perspective,” Review of Innovation and Competitiveness: A Journal of Economic and Social Research, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2019), pp. 21–42.
11 Kunyuan Wanghe et al., “Gravity Model Toolbox: An Automated and Open-Source ArcGIS Tool to Build and Prioritize Ecological Corridors in Urban Landscapes,” Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 22 (2020), p. e01012; Oscar Martinez, Jose-Manuel Garcia & Narender Kumar, “The Gravity Model as a Tool for Decision Making: Some Highlights for Indian Roads,” Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 58 (2021), pp. 333–339; Abdolrasoul Ghasemi, Elnaz Miandoabchi & Shiva Soroushnia, “The Attractiveness of Seaport-Based Transport Corridors: An Integrated Approach Based on Scenario Planning and Gravity Models,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 23 (2020), pp. 522–547.

12 S. J. Hix, “Regional Integration,” in Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2001, pp. 12922-
12925.

13 Andrew Moravcsik, “Liberal Intergovernmentalism,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, August 27, 2020, https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1065 (Accessed: 07.07.2024); Andrew Moravcsik, “Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 33 (1995), p. 611.
14 Giandomenico Majone, “The Common Sense of European Integration,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 13, No. 5 (2006), pp. 607–626; Frank Schimmelfenning, “Liberal Intergovernmentalism,” in Marianne Riddervold (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises, Cham: Springer, pp. 61–78.
15 Frank Hamilton Hankins, American Sociological Review, American Sociological Society, Michigan: The University of Michigan, 1985, p. 378; Karl Deutsch, The Analysis of International Relations, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968, p. 159.
16 “Annex: ASEM Connectivity,” ASEAN, https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Annex-I.pdf (Accessed: 10.10.2024); Manuel Castells, The Rise of the Network Society, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010; Corneliu Bjola & Marcus Holmes, Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, London: Routledge, 2015; Thomas Hale & David Held (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations, Cambridge: Polity, 2011.

17 Peter Frankopan, The New Silk Roads: The Present and Future of World, London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018; Robert O. Keohane & Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, Boston:
Longman, 2012.
18 Fabrizio Tassinari, “A Synergy for Black Sea Regional Cooperation: Guidelines for an EU Initiative,” CEPS Policy Brief, No. 105, August 2009, https://www.ceps.eu/download/publication/?id=5333&pdf=1334.pdf (Accessed: 10.07.2024); “The Black Sea Region: New Conditions, Enduring Interests,” Chatham House, January 16, 2009, https://www.chathamhouse. org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Russia%20and%20Eurasia/160109blacksea.pdf (Accessed: 12.07.2024); Ruxandra Ivan, New Regionalism or No Regionalism? Emerging Regionalism in the Black Sea Area, Surrey: Ashgate, 2012.
19 Özgür Tüfekçi “Turkey’s Relations with Russia, Central Asian and the Caucasus States,” in Yaşar Sarı & Seyit Ali Avcu (eds.), Russia, Central Asia and the Caucasia, Eskişehir: Anadolu University Press, 2020, pp. 207–231; Özgür Tüfekçi & Ebru Birinci, “Russian Foreign Policy,” Russia, Central Asia and the Caucasia, Eskişehir: Anadolu University Press, 2020, pp. 61–69; Özgür Tüfekçi & Rahman Dağ, “Whither Global Governance? An Approach to the World Politics,” in Özgür Tüfekçi & Rahman Dağ (eds.), Trends and Transformation in World Politics, London: Rowman, 2022, pp. 137–150.
20 Özgür Tüfekçi, “Bölgesel İşbirliklerinin Türk-Rus İlişkilerine Etkisi: Traceca ve Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği Örnekleri,” TYB Akademi, Vol. 6, No. 17 (2016), pp. 159–172.
21 Mushtaq A. Kaw, “Theorizing EU-TRACECA Relationship in Eurasian Context,” Strategic Analysis, Vol. 43, No. 5 (2019), pp. 418–434; “Investment Projects,” TRACECA, https://
traceca-org.org/en/investments/ (Accessed: 10.10.2024); “Projects,” TRACECA Turkey, https://traceca.uab.gov.tr/projeler-traceca (Accessed: 10.10.2024).
22 Faridun Sattarov, “The Emerging Potential of the Middle Corridor,” Horizons: Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, No. 21 (2022), pp. 198–207.
23 Middle Trade and Transport Corridor: Policies and Investments to Triple Freight Volumes and Halve Travel Time by 2030, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2023.

24 The figures pertaining to foreign trade volumes for the period and countries examined in the study are presented in the Appendix.
25 “Free Access to Detailed Global Trade Data,” UN Comtrade, https://comtradeplus.un.org/(Accessed: 10.07.2024).
26 “World Development Indicators,” World Bank, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (Accessed: 10.07.2024).
27 See Google Maps, https://maps.google.com/ (Accessed: 12.07.2024).
28 “Free Trade Agreements,” Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Trade, https://www.trade.gov.tr/free-trade-agreements (Accessed: 15.07.2024).
29 “Crisis Watch,” International Crisis Group, https://www.crisisgroup.org/crisiswatch?utm_campaign=cw_menu_link (Accessed: 15.07.2024).
30 Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, Understanding Globalization through the Lens of Gravity. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2019.
31 Brad Christenson, “World Trade in Apparel: An Analysis of Trade Flows Using the Gravity Model,” International Regional Science Review, Vol. 17, No. 2 (1994), pp. 151–166; J. E. Anderson, “The Gravity Model,” Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2011), pp. 133–160.
32 Walter Isard, “Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 68, No. 2 (1954), pp. 305–320.
33 Jan Tinbergen, Shaping the World Economy: An Analysis of World Trade Flows, New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1962.
34 Luigi Caponi, “Theory of Commercial Gravitational Fields in Economics: The Case of Europe,” Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 23, No. 1 (2023), pp. 845–884.
35 Pentti Pöyhönen, “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 90, No. 1 (1963), pp. 93–100.
36 James E. Anderson, “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No. 1 (1979), pp. 106–116.
37 Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, No. 3
(1985), pp. 474–481.
38 Thibault Fally, “Structural Gravity and Fixed Effects,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 97, No. 1 (2015), pp. 76–85.
39 John McCallum, “National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns,” American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 3 (1995), pp. 615–623.
40 James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle,” American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 1 (2003), pp. 170–192.
41 J. M. C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, “The Log of Gravity,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 88, No. 4 (2006), pp. 641–658.
42 Elhanan Helpman, Marc Melitz & Yona Rubinstein, “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 123, No. 2 (2008), pp. 441–487.
43 Saleh Shahriar, Sokvibol Kea & Lu Qian, “Determinants of China’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment in the Belt & Road Economies: A Gravity Model Approach,” International Journal
of Emerging Markets, Vol. 15, No. 3 (2020), pp. 427–445.
44 Menggiu Enkang Li & Yu Chen, “Analysis of China’s Importance in ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ Trade Based on Gravity Model,” Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 17 (2020), pp. 1–20.

45 Nazir Muhammad Abdullahi et.al, “Examining the Determinants and Efficiency of China’s Agricultural Exports Using a Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model,” Plos One, Vol. 17, No. 9
(2022), p. e0274187.
46 Alper Yılmaz, “Turkish Economy in the Belt Road Initiative: A Gravity Model for International Trade,” Journal of Management and Economies Research, Vol. 20, No. 4 (2022),
pp. 1–23.
47 Michael Pfaffermayr, “Gravity Models, PPML Estimation and Bias of the Robust Standard Errors,” Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 26, No. 18 (2019), pp. 1467–1471.
48 Celine Carrere, “Revisiting the Effects of Regional Trade Agreements on Trade Flows with Proper Specification of Gravity Model,” European Economic Review, Vol. 50, No. 2 (2006),
pp. 223–247.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *